Ryan Widmer, a 27 year old man, was charged with murder just 2 days after he found his wife unresponsive in their bathtub, on August 11, 2008. Ryan was downstairs watching TV, when his wife of only 114 days kissed him goodnight and told him she was going upstairs to take a bath. This was part of Sarah Widmer’s regular routine as she loved to take long baths. Ryan went upstairs about ½ hour to 45 minutes later to walk into their bathroom and find Sarah unresponsive in the tub. Ryan tried as best he could to perform CPR. The 911 operator didn’t provide any help whatsoever.
After 45 minutes to 1 hour of rigorous CPR and 5 intubation attempts they transported Sarah to the hospital and she was pronounced dead. There were no signs of struggle, no prior history of relationship issues, etc. However, Sarah had not been feeling well the entire day and had a bad headache. She was also known by family and friends to easily fall asleep and had actually fallen asleep in the tub numerous times, even before she met Ryan (as stated by Sarah’s brother). An expert at the trial spoke that in the U.S. every year about 300,000 people under the age of 35 die and that these people’s autopsies do not show any sign of what they died from - a staggering statistic.
Continue Reading Ryan and Sarah's Story
Prosecution |
Defense |
|
1. Prosecutors claim Ryan held Sarah by the neck and forcibly drowned her during an altercation and cleaned up the scene before calling 911. |
1. Neither Ryan nor Sarah had any marks or wounds on their bodies and there were no signs of a struggle. A search of the house showed no evidence of a cleanup. Sarah's French Manicure and Pedicure were still perfect. |
|
2. Because of the two blood spots on the carpet, prosecutors said Ryan moved Sarah's body before calling 911. |
2. Officer Bishop testified he might have helped Ryan move Sarah's body from the bathroom doorway into the bedroom. (1st Trial) He couldn't remember if he helped move Sarah. (2nd Trial) He "absolutely did not" help Ryan move her body. (3rd Trial). |
|
3. Ryan allegedly confessed to Jennifer Crew that he punched Sarah in the chest during an argument and then blacked out. When he came to, she was laying dead on the bathroom floor. He said he forgot to clean up the spilled waste basket in the bathroom. |
3. Jennifer Crew has a criminal record and is a recovering drug addict now on methadone, who saw Ryan's story on Dateline. Most of her testimony, word for word, was from the Dateline program. Officer Bishop dumped the bathroom trash can looking for illegal drugs. (1st & 2nd trial) He didn’t remember dumping it, but agreed that he's been blamed for it. (3rd Trial). |
|
4. The lead detective (Braley) and the coroner's investigator were present during the autopsy and discussed with the coroner what the manner of death might be. Det. Braley gathered evidence and dusted the tub for fingerprints claiming streaks on the tub showed signs of Sarah trying to save herself. |
4. The coroner was criticized in another trial for allowing investigating officers to name the manner of death. Braley was not a trained evidence technician and criminalist Wm. Hilliard said none of the fingerprints were of any value. He couldn't tell who they belonged to or when they were put on the tub. Braley was forced to resign when it was verified that he lied on his employment application and didn't have the training or experience that he claimed. |
|
5. First responders testified that Sarah's body, the tub, towels, clothing, magazines, floor, etc. were all dry. |
5. Officers and EMTs wore gloves when feeling for wetness. Signs of water in the tub included droplets on the drain and a small area of water pooled near the middle of the tub. Some officers admitted they didn't touch anything to feel for wetness. Magazines were crinkled, indicating they had been wet. Two EMTs testified that Sarah's body was moist or not overly wet. Officer Bishop noticed an Ionic Breeze fan knocked over near where Sarah was lying. (1st Trial) The dryer was cold, indicating that it had not been used. |
|
6. Coroner Uptegrove declared Sarah's death a homicide before reading the EMT and ER reports, and without talking to Ryan or Sarah's mother about any health issues. |
6. The coroner spoke briefly with Sarah's mother after Ryan had already been charged, arrested and arraigned. He never did speak to Ryan and was not told that she frequently fell asleep in the tub. Her mother and brother knew she fell asleep in the tub. There were numerous mistakes on the run report, as well as three different copies. |
|
7. The coroner made his decision based on the bruising on the side and back of her neck. He said there was no evidence of any heart problem or seizure. |
7. EMTs tried to intubate Sarah twice in the house, once while the ambulance was in the driveway and two more times while en route to the hospital. An EMT assisted twice by performing the Sellick maneuver. He held Sarah's head and neck firmly while applying pressure at the thyroid cartilage. EMTs worked on Sarah for almost 45 minutes before leaving for the hospital. Doctors testified that 5 intubations would cause neck bruising and in a drowning, the blood is thinner and bruising would spread farther. Forensic pathologist Dr. Balko testified coroner Uptegrove didn't take enough heart or brain tissue samples to verify there was no heart problem or seizure and didn't test for narcolepsy. Coroner Uptegrove has been criticized for taking short cuts and having a coroner's job in three counties. |
|
8. Sarah's mother said Sarah was always healthy, had no history of heart problems and there was no history of heart problems or seizures in the family. She didn't recall Sarah ever falling asleep anywhere. |
8. In the 3rd trial, she admitted that Sarah had surgery for a cleft palate and had a heart murmur as an infant. She took Sarah to a pediatric cardiologist but never followed up over the years. |
|
9. In the 2nd trial Sarah's mother said, they're part of a younger generation and talk differently to each other. She said, "They would argue on certain things. They got in an argument on how to hang pictures so they called Sarah's brother to come and hang all the pictures in their house. In the 3rd trial she said they called each other "nasty names". |
9. In previous trials she testified that Ryan and Sarah got along well together and they were very happy. They bought a house and moved in together and Ryan became part of their family even before they married. When asked what the "nasty names" were, she couldn't say. |

| Prosecution Witness: Floyd E. Hulett III |
| Written by Mike Mayleben |
| Friday, 06 May 2011 18:41 |
|
Direct Exam: John Arnold He lives in Iowa and is a disabled veteran having been injured in Somalia. He's a student at Kirkwood Community College in Human/Disability Services. Jennifer Crew has been his "significant other" since Feb. 2005 and they moved in together in Aug. 2005. He found out about Jennifer's conversations with Ryan Widmer from Jennifer. He talked about basketball with Ryan, on a car speaker phone while they were driving somewhere. He slept downstairs for personal reasons and on the night of the phone call, Jennifer came downstairs crying, saying "uh..uh...he did it." He thought it was the day before his daughter's birthday, which is on Oct. 27th, but he's not sure; "right around there", he said. It was about 1:00 a.m. She was upset, scared and hurt because she has a big heart. He told Jennifer to contact the prosecutor's office but she didn't. She stayed in contact with Ryan for 2 or 3 weeks after the phone call. He said she still talked about the trial up until the time she finally contacted the prosecutors in June 2010. Nothing further. Cross Exam: Jay Clark On June 17, 2010, he was interviewed in Iowa by investigators and the interview was recorded. He was there to give information to investigators and to support Jennifer, but she wasn't in the room during the interview. It was just him and two investigators. Clark said that according to the interview transcript, he told investigators the time was around 3 a.m. when she came downstairs, but today he said about 1:00 a.m. That's possible, he said, but he was asleep so he wasn't sure what time she came down. Clark reminded him that he just testified that the phone call happened on Oct. 26th, the day before his daughter's birthday, but he told investigators he didn't know the exact date. He said when he spoke to investigators he wasn't in the right frame of mind. "This isn't my life," he replied, "I have other obligations". He agreed that his ability to remember the date was connected to his daughter's birthday and her birth date hasn't changed. Clark said he told investigators in June that she only talked to Ryan a few more days after the call, but today he said it was 2 or 3 weeks. He said he just assumed it was a few days when he talked to investigators. "I'm not always in her business," he said. He agreed he made the wrong assumption. During the June interview, Clark reminded him, he was asked about Jennifer wanting to come to Cincinnati to support Ryan. He said at first she planned on coming here, but a few days later, he found out Ryan said she could stay at his mother's, and that's when he told her, "if you go, don't come back." He said he didn't have a problem with the online or phone relationship. "No harm no foul. But when she decided to come here and stay at the defendant's house, that's foul." Clark asked him why Jennifer continued to contact Ryan and he replied, "If someone is threatening you, you don't want to leave the situation where you're being threatened, putting your life in danger." Clark asked if that was the only reason he could think of and Hulett replied "Yes". He didn't know if Jennifer contacted Ryan the day after the call but he knew his daughter was supposed to receive an e-card from Ryan for her birthday. He said that he knows about Jennifer's methadone program and she's been in it for about two years. Clark asked if it had to do with her theft conviction and he said it did not. Nothing further. |